"Quality you know what it is, yet you don't know what it is." Many people often feel this way when it comes to any art because art is so subjective. What moves one person doesn't always move another and so the art of grading writing is not a simple task that we as writing teachers must do.
According to this chapter the first job of the writing teacher is to find good writing in students' worst writing. They suggest that we skip the criticism and encourage or focus on areas that will do the most good.
Two attributes to good writing:
- Interesting to read
- has voice of author
- has movement
- has sense of humor
- informative
- inventive: says something new or something old in a new way
- aware of audience
- uses detail, but not too much
- uses words that sing: rich in imagery, rhythm and repetition, filled with word play
- has form
- makes sense
- observes convention of mechanics and usage (small portion of what good writing is)
- Its what you and others like.
- What do you think? Is it honest?
- Does it say enough?
- Does it say more than it needs?
On the other hand I am not sure if I can "skip the criticism" because I feel without it how else can the meet the standards or make their writing better? How else will the become interesting or skillful writers. I also don't like to think of my comments as criticisms, but suggestions on what they can do to make their writing better, keeping the three questions at the end of the chapter in mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment